I HAVE NO LIFE LA LA LA LA
I was reading about the Hubble Space Telescope last night.
Then Taylor Swift came on shuffle.
And then this happened this afternoon.
I Knew You Were Hubble (sung to Taylor Swift’s I Knew You Were Trouble)
Once upon a time in 1990
We sent you into space to show us what we couldn’t see
From here on earth, from here on earth, from here on earth
At first there was a snag: your mirror was misplaced
But with several quick repairs we saw the galaxies you faced
With clarity, with clarity, with clarity
And your first images had us all in awe
When we realized all the beauty that you saw
‘Cause I knew you were Hubble when you took pics
Of the vast cosmos, oh
Showed us new vistas with some shutter clicks
Space so diverse, oh
I knew you were Hubble when you took pics
Of the vast cosmos, oh
Showed us new vistas with some shutter clicks
Now we’re picturing our universe
Oh, oh, Hubble, Hubble, Hubble
Oh, oh, Hubble, Hubble, Hubble
Nebulae alive with purples, reds, and greens
Our wonder begs for more, and you give us the means
To satisfy these needs, to satisfy these needs, to satisfy these needs
And I guess you’re booked up with professionals’ requests
But some of those demands end up resulting in your best
Photography, photography, photography
Like the time you stared into one part of space
And your resulting Deep Field put us humans in our place, yeah!
I knew you were Hubble when you took pics
Of the vast cosmos, oh
Showed us new vistas with some shutter clicks
Space so diverse, oh
I knew you were Hubble when you took pics
Of the vast cosmos, oh
Showed us new vistas with some shutter clicks
Now we’re picturing our universe
Oh, oh, Hubble, Hubble, Hubble
Oh, oh, Hubble, Hubble, Hubble
And after 20 years in 2010
You’re still doing your job, and well, by bringing awe to all of man, yeah
I knew you were Hubble when you took pics
Of the vast cosmos, oh
Showed us new vistas with some shutter clicks
Space so diverse, oh
I knew you were Hubble when you took pics
Of the vast cosmos, oh
Showed us new vistas with some shutter clicks
Now we’re picturing our universe
Oh, oh, Hubble, Hubble, Hubble
Oh, oh, Hubble, Hubble, Hubble
I knew you were Hubble when you took pics
Hubble, Hubble, Hubble
I knew you were Hubble when you took pics
Hubble, Hubble, Hubble
Can you blame me, though? I mean seriously. How many things rhyme with “Hubble”?
Book Review: 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea
I was going to do the whole “utilize random number generator to determine next book to read” thing, but I think I owe the library like $400,000 in late book fees and I’ve been having way too much anxiety to deal with people as of late, so I just decided to go with the first book on the list. Which was lucky, ‘cause I actually own this one: 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea by Jules Verne.
Have I read this before: YES! I read it in high school some time…let’s see…10th grade. 15 years old.
Review: I love Verne. I love this book. I love how perfectly it is written. I remember searching on Amazon for a copy of this and one of the many, many reviewers complained that this book was boring.
How the hell could anyone see this book as boring??
- Mysterious underwater thingy hunted by a ship.
- Misanthropic captain with a love for all things ocean.
- Shipwrecks.
- Atlantis.
- Underwater burials.
- The South Pole.
- Near asphyxiation.
- Giant squid.
- Maelstroms.
Hell, that list alone should make you excited!
I don’t want to give too much away about this one because I want people to FREAKING READ IT. Just know that it’s good. It’s very good. It’s freaking Jules Verne, yo.
Reeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaad iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit.
Favorite part: The South Pole, man. It’s, “are we there yet? Are we there yet? Are we there yet?” for like a whole chapter and then when they finally do reach it after making a ton of checks to see if it’s the right place (this was set in the 1800s, after all), the landing is described beautifully. Like I said, it’s freaking Jules Verne, yo.
Rating: this gets 9/10. Fantastic.
Also, happy 26th birthday to Michael “Rage Quit” Jones. Your Rage Quit vids got me into Achievement Hunter, whose videos have been a consistent source of amusement since about January of this year (which has been super helpful for my mental health). Keep ragin’, you awesome dude.
Anxiety, I will STAB you in the FACE
Once you let me leave the house.
In the meantime…
STATS JOKES STATS JOKES STATS JOKES!
Because it’s that kind of a day.
- One day there was a fire in a wastebasket in the Dean’s office and in rushed a physicist, a chemist, and a statistician. The physicist immediately starts to work on how much energy would have to be removed from the fire to stop the combustion. The chemist works on which reagent would have to be added to the fire to prevent oxidation. While they are doing this, the statistician is setting fires to all the other wastebaskets in the office. “What are you doing?” they demanded. “Well, to solve the problem, obviously you need a large sample size” the statistician replies.
- What’s the question the Cauchy distribution hates the most?
“Got a moment?” - Did you hear about the statistician who was looking all over for the sum of eigenvalues from a variance-covariance matrix but couldn’t find a trace?
- Did you hear about the nonparametrician who couldn’t get his driving license? He couldn’t pass the sign test.
- A middle-aged man suddenly contracted the dreaded disease kurtosis. not only was this disease severely debilitating, but he had the most virulent strain called leptokurtosis. A close friend told him his only hope was to see a statistical physician who specialized in this type of disease. The man was very fortunate to locate a specialist but he had to travel 800 miles for an appointment.
After a thorough physical exam, the statistical physician exclaimed, “Sir, you are indeed a lucky person in that the FDA has just approved a new drug called Mesokurtimide for your illness. This drug will bulk you in the middle, smooth out your stubby tail, and restore your longer range of functioning. In other words, you will feel ‘NORMAL’ again!” - What did one regression coefficient say to the other regression coefficient?
“I’m partial to you!” - Why are the mean, median, and mode like a valuable piece of real estate?
LOCATION! LOCATION! LOCATION!
Yay, I feel better now.
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
UGH I hate days where I’m hung up on comparing myself to others and feeling super petty for doing so.
I mean, it’s so freaking pointless. I sit here looking at everyone else who has loads of smarts or who has a family or who has tons of friends or who is just super enjoyable to be around and I feel so freaking insignificant.
I have to stop and just say shut up, Claudia. You are not insignificant. You are made of universe. You are not insignificant. The people you’re comparing yourself to? They are made of universe. They are not insignificant. We are all made of universe. We are all equal. The universe comprises all of us.
It just seems so dumb to be hung up on trivial comparisons when in 70 years or so (or less) I’ll be feeding worms and maggots and in 70 million years I might be part of a star. The same thing could be said of others, too.
But then I think, well, wait a minute. These feelings of inadequacy and jealousy and pettiness and whatnot—should they be embraced? Are they not part of the whole “hey, I’m a human being for a stint” package? Are these feelings part of the universe as well? Should I be glad I’m in such a quandary about this stuff because maybe, when part of me is a small section of a comet being sucked into a black hole, it won’t be privy to such emotion, so I should embrace it while I can?
Or maybe they’re not—maybe comets and stars and gaseous nebulae experience “emotion” too, but just differently. Like maybe they don’t have jealousy or pity or anger, but maybe they have some sort of similar subjective conscious-like experiences that could be analogous to human emotion. Or maybe their “emotion” is unique to them and something human-formed universe stuff can’t experience.
Ya just gotta wonder.
(Ha, and now I’m not feeling petty at all. Thanks, universe!)
MATHFEST
“MAA MathFest 2013 will be held at the Connecticut Convention Center and Hartford Marriott Downtown in Hartford, Connecticut.”
WHAT THE CRAP IS THIS CONFERENCE AND WHY CAN’T I BE THERE?
There’s a minicourse entitled “Passion-Driven Statistics: A Supportive, Project-Based, Multidisciplinary Introductory Curriculum” and another one called “Mathematical Expeditions in Polar Science” in which “Participants will learn about many different areas of scientific research going on in the Arctic and in Antarctica, including sea ice, glaciers, ice cores, phenology, astronomy, biology, and satellite mapping.”
Math and Antarctica? Seriously?
AND DR. ARTHUR BENJAMIN (THIS GUY) IS GOING TO BE THERE?!?
Nooooooooo life is not fair, it’d cost like an entire semester’s tuition to get me to Connecticut.
I’m sad now.
This Week’s Science Blog: DROP THE BASS! …er, Pitch.
THE PITCH DROPPED!
AND IT WAS FILMED!
WHAT THE HECK AM I YELLING ABOUT?!
In 1944, an experiment was set up that would last quite a long time. At Trinity College in Dublin, tar pitch was heated and placed into a funnel. The funnel was placed in a jar and was left alone. It’s still sitting there today. Why? Because pitch is something that, at first glance, behaves very much like a solid. It just kinda sits there and if you hit it with something hard enough, it shatters. What they wanted to show with this experiment (which is actually similar to an even longer-lived experiment done in Australia) is that, given time, pitch will exhibit liquid properties. In particular, over a (very long) stretch of time, the pitch in the funnel will succumb to gravity and drop to the bottom of the jar.
So that’s the basic idea. But the big deal in all of this is actually witnessing these drops. Averaging things out between the Australian and Dublin versions of the experiment, it takes somewhere between 7 and 13 years for the drops to happen. That’s a lot of time sitting and watching for a payoff that takes a split-second. Up until now, no one has witnessed it happening.
However, when the Dublin scientists realized last April that a drop was imminent, they did something they could finally do because of today’s technology: they set up a camera to record the pitch* when it finally fell.
And a week ago? VICTORY! On Thursday, July 11th, a pitch drop was not only witnessed, but filmed! See a gif of it here.
HOW COOL?
And we know it’ll happen again…we just need to wait.
*Actually, I think I read somewhere that they tried this in Australia in like 2000, but the camera wasn’t on when it happened. Oops.
Book Review: The Remains of the Day
HEY LOOK it’s one of those book things off my book list that I said I’d read. Took long enough. I blame school/work/teaching/my obsession with the history of calculus/that amazing Leibniz biography.
Anyway. I utilized a random number generator to give me my first selection off the list and it landed on #157. That happened to be The Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishiguro (which is good ‘cause I actually kinda stole that from the library by accident like 7 months ago).
Have I read this before: Nopers. First timer!
Review*: I think there’s kind of two different things I can react to here based on how I interpreted the book itself. 1: The main character as a person in his particular occupation; 2: the main character as a guide through a certain time in history.
1. The main character as a person. This was the part of the book that held the most impact for me. Stevens is a traditional English butler who, throughout his several day journey, reflects on his work and his life by way of describing several key characteristics that he believes a true butler should have. It’s a really interesting take on this idea of “living for the now” versus “living for a good tomorrow” but done in a very subtle way, I think. Very interesting. I really enjoyed the narration and the attention to detail in Stevens’ memories.
2. The main character as a guide through history. I think I would have gotten a lot more out of it if I knew my 20th century history a little bit better (been stuck in the 1600s, sorry). But I think people who DO know enough about that part of history will really, really get a lot out of this book.
But overall, very interesting. I’d possibly read it again if for no other reason than to try and absorb more of that personal reflection that Stevens subtly gives throughout. If you like stories told from a first-person perspective that have quite a reflective nature, I’d recommend this one for ya.
Favorite part: When Stevens is requested to tell young Reginald about “the birds and the bees” and spends like a whole day following him around trying to find some way to do it.
(Hmm…probably should have some sort of rating thing on these…)
Rating: 6/10.
*I haven’t really come up with a standard method for reviewing/summarizing/rating yet, so these posts may slowly evolve into something stable. Or they might stay like this. Or they might cease altogether one school commences again. However it turns out, I’ll try not to give any major spoilers in these things.
I can’t believe I’m getting paid for this.
I’m so lucky to have a job that brings me happiness. I know it’s not a permanent one (unfortunately), but to be paid to do something that doesn’t even feel like work is freaking awesome. The summer session of stats is over this Thursday. Now that I’ve (almost) finished teaching three sessions of intro stats, I think I’ve figured out the main reasons why I love this job so much.
The obvious one: I love statistics.
I think I kind of always have, I just didn’t know it. When I started college back in the stone age in 2006, I went into psychology not because I didn’t know what major to pick and that’s kind of the “default” one, but because I was actually interested in methods of quantifying intelligence. After I took the class I’m teaching now (STAT 251), I kind of changed my mind and became interested in psychological testing in general. Then it was recommended that I take MORE stats classes in order to solidify my chances to get into a psychometrics program…and, well, we all see where that’s led. I just really, really like stats.
I’m imparting knowledge.
This is a totally cliché reason, I know, but it’s a reason nonetheless. There’s something very satisfying about imparting knowledge to people. It’s like giving them power. I think it’s even more satisfying in the case of statistics because a lot of peoples’ visceral reaction to a stats class is either “god, this is going to be so BORING” or “god, this is going to be so HARD” or a combination of the two. I love showing (or at least trying to show) that stats can be both fun and fairly easy if you get a solid understanding of what you’re actually doing when you do stats.
It’s intro statistics…
Intro classes are broad as hell. A lot of time, in my opinion, they exist to kind of help “weed out” people from certain majors before getting more in depth with the history/materials of whatever the major is (or to put it in a less sinister-sounding phrasing: they’re “survey” classes used to give people a general sweeping idea of what the major entails before they fully engage in it).
STAT 251 is like that too, but there’s actually kind of an extra bonus to that. Since it’s a broad intro class and we have to cover a lot of stuff, we really can only touch on the stuff that’s really, really important. That really, really important stuff is actually the really, really useful stuff—it’s the statistics that non-statisticians use. It’s the stuff that biologists use. It’s the stuff that advertisers use. It’s the stuff that a person working for a big business uses. It’s “hey, you only gonna take one stats class ever? Here’s the stuff that will get you through most of your life.” Because you WILL use something from this class at LEAST once. I’m definitely not saying that more “complex” stats aren’t important…I’m just saying that this is the stuff that even those people who stand at the entrance of a stats class with their fingers in an “X” and yelling “No…nooooooooo!” will probably use. And that’s cool.
…and almost everyone has to take it.
You really get a mix of ability/familiarity with the material in an intro class, I think. In the case of stats, some people are coming right out of high school and have taken AP stats. Others have never heard the term “median.” Both this semester and last semester I had students come up to me who said something to the effect of, “I was terrified to take stats because I knew nothing about it and people always said it was hard (or “I hated AP Stats!). But this class was actually really cool and I’ll definitely be using this stuff in [insert major here].” Seriously. I think one person said they even want to go for a stats minor. That produces so much freaking glee you don’t even know, and that’s actually probably the biggest reason why I like teaching intro so much: you get to expose people to stuff they’ve never seen, and in doing so, there’s always the chance that you’ll spark an interest or fascination (Tests and Measurements did that for me, holy hell). Every time a student tells me they like the material or that they really got something out of the class I just want to jump up and down and hug them. But I don’t. Because then I would get fired for being inappropriate.
It’s fun.
I have yet to dread going to work. Even dragging my unwilling body out of bed at 6 AM, my mind’s like, “ooh, get up you lazy fool! Today you get to teach them REGRESSION!” I think that’s the reason, too, why I don’t exhibit any of my usual public speaking anxiety when I’m teaching: I just love stats and I love talking about stats and it’s a really casual thing for me rather than being something I have to prepare for or rehearse 4,000 times. Like…I would teach for free simply because it makes me so freaking happy (but don’t tell anyone that, I need money to keep going to school, haha).
END!
HAHAHA I JUST FOUND ALL MY OLD FLASH ANIMATIONS
Matt, do you remember this nonsense? Oh my god.
And here’s this bit of whatthehell.
These were in an entirely different folder than The Wrath of XBar for some reason. Enjoy.
Ouch
A typical “Claudia Fails in Hilarious Ways” day proceeds as follows:
It’s 2.19 miles to my office from my house, and after walking about 40 miles in the past few days, I had TWO MILES TO GO to reach 850 total walking miles for the year by the time today rolled around. But I was late getting going this morning, so to save time I decided to ride my bike to my office instead.
Consequences:
- Ended up riding through a cloud of angry bees and getting stung on the inside of my lip twice.
- Spent like 10 minutes trying to frantically extricate the stingers (while spitting pieces of bee out of my mouth…ew) with no mirror and while parked on the side of a busy street (this happened about halfway in between home and work). Keep in mind that I’ve never gotten stung by a bee before, so I wasn’t sure whether to just expect pain or to expect anaphylactic shock. Luckily the latter didn’t happen.
- Finally got to campus; was going to ride to Rite Aid to get some Benadryl or something but I had work to do and stuff to post for class so I just said “screw it.”
- Spent my last $1.50 in cash buying something cold from a vending machine to ice my lip. Of course, I had to buy a pop, ‘cause the vending machine that vends bottled water was broken. Now I have a random pop that I guess I’ll just store in my office.
- And my lip looks like the victim of a really lopsided collagen injection. Hoping that diminishes by Monday’s class.
It’s like the universe said “HAHA YOU STUPID, that’s what you get for trying to cheat the system.”
Oh well. Gotta walk home now anyway; at least I’ll hit 850 as long as I don’t inhale a snake or something. *optimism*
Edit: 854 miles! Take that, bees!
It’s My Infinitive and I’ll Split It if I Want To!
FREAKING MIGRAINES, MAN.
Anyway.
I’m trying to edit Prime so that it sucks less. I’m to the point in the story where the main character, 27, is talking to the imaginary unit i. And of course I wrote the damn thing in first-person, so I’m getting phrases like:
- “i and I”
- “I said to i“
- “i was no longer there, leaving me alone in the space”
- “it occurred to me that i was leading me in a circle”
What in the nightmarish hell was I thinking.
No one will ever want to read this nonsense.
Last Leibniz-Centric blog for a while, I promise (maybe)
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz.
This man.
THIS MAN.
Let me tell you about this sexy, badass, wig-adorned genius, shall I?
I just finished Antognazzi’s amazingly thorough biography of him. As I mentioned, I had gotten to when he was 40 years old in the bio by the time I raved about him a few days ago, and so I still had about 30 more years to cover in the latter half of the book.
And let me tell you something: as fascinating as the first 40 years of his life appeared to be, the last 30 were even more amazing.
Here’s the run-down of awesomeness, presented in bullet form so that I can keep track of stuff.
- Leibniz was a very social man. He loved being with people, talking to them about everything and exchanging ideas and thoughts. According to the people in charge of archiving Leibniz’ work/letters/papers, he corresponded with no fewer than 1,100 individuals. That’s insane. And this wasn’t like “Facebook friends approve them and then never speak to them again” correspondence. This was “all his free time was consumed by writing letters to these other people” correspondence. Even when he was older and had bad gout, an injured leg, and was extremely near-sighted, he was still hell bent on getting out of Hanover to visit people. Probably the saddest aspect of this incredibly social demeanor, though, was the fact that he outlived the vast majority of people with whom he corresponded, including many of his closest friends. How sad must it have been for him to slowly lose these people over the course of like a decade (a LOT of them died in the 1690s; Leibniz lived until 1716).
- He. Did. Everything. Far from the “I’ll lock myself in this room and just think for all eternity” picture that I think we tend to have of philosophers, Leibniz was always just out doing stuff. Hell, he personally supervised some of his proposed improvements on the Harz mines (he had some ideas to keep them from flooding) and was constantly trying to start up scientific societies and journals across Germany. Though he appeared to consistently run into bad luck with these schemes throughout his life (money was always tight for him and it seemed like every time he got a project going there’d be one thing that’d go wrong and cause everything to fall apart), he never let go of many of his main projects aimed at improving the world.
- For all his running around in mainland Europe, he was not one to shirk (at least entirely) the duties set forth to him by his various employers. Example: his main employer in his later years, Georg Ludwig, put him in charge of writing a complete history of the House of Guelph (a dynasty of German and English monarchs). This was supposed to take like 10 years max but, Leibniz being Leibniz, he kept the task in the back of his mind as he traveled about and slowly began to amass a huge amount of information he deemed relevant to the history. Ludwig was always asking him, “Hey man, how’s that history comin’?” and Leibniz always managed to say, truthfully, that he was still researching, all the while sneakily making his way around the continent to do the other Leibniz things that he really wanted to focus on. However, as time went on and Leibniz continued to travel much to the dismay of his employer, tension rose between the two and Ludwig became more and more upset with him. I particularly enjoyed this little quote of frustration: “at the very least he [Leibniz] should tell me where he is going when he takes off. I never know where to find him.” By the time Ludwig was finally like, “Gottfried, dude, just sit your butt down and write this thing or I’m suspending your salary!” the amount of material Leibniz had gathered was so extensive that the history actually was left unfinished by the time he died. And that’s even with him spending the last 5 years or so of his life sequestered in his study (he was pretty much forbidden to travel by that point), frantically trying to get it done so that he could pursue more important tasks.
- I mentioned this before but it bears mentioning again, because it’s one of the main reasons I like Leibniz so much: it seems like he was a good guy. The idea a lot of people seem to have about European White Guys, especially of that era, is probably something along the lines of, “each one thought they themselves were correct in their thoughts, ideas, and philosophies, and all other cultures/genders/backgrounds/European White Guys were unquestionably wrong!” Leibniz communicated with men, women, uneducated people, very learned people, people from many different countries…and from what it sounds like, he was just very open to the possibility of views different than his own. He seemed to take it all in and use it—regardless of who/where it came from—to further refine what he himself believed or knew. He was also a major Sinophile, in part because of his interest in creating a “universal alphabet” and the parallels he saw between that and Chinese symbols/writing.
- Even when people disagreed with him he seemed to retain a polite congeniality in correspondence with the disagreeing party(ies). The one exception to this appears to be the final years (at least for him) of the calculus dispute. But by then he was really just like, “gettin’ real tired of your shit, Keill,” which honestly was quite a valid reaction by that point in time. (Side note: I really like how this biography talks about the calculus dispute but doesn’t make it the focus of Leibniz’ last few years of life. It really emphasizes that even though he was at war with freaking Isaac Newton and his cronies, he was still trying to bring his other more important projects to fruition).
Just…nnnf. I love this guy.
Man, I was going to restart my fiction list today with 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, but I don’t think I can read anything else for a few days. I’m like in mourning now that I’ve finished this book. I seriously recommend reading it, even if you’re not a hardcore Leibniz fangirl/fanguy/whatev.
TWSB: HIDE YO CELLPHONES, HIDE YO POWERGRIDS!
Holy solar-driven demise, Batman. Look at those enormous sunspots.
1785 and 1787—the names for these two groups of spots—are pretty much staring earth in the face right now.
Sun spots are dark areas of intense magnetic activity that, when the activity gets super-intense, spit out energy in the form of solar flares or coronal mass ejections. The flares/ejections fire out clouds of magnetic energy and solar material into space.
And what happens when these things hit earth? Normally, we end up with more extreme aurora that are able to be seen at lower latitudes. But if the storm of magnetism is really strong, satellites can short out and power lines are disabled.
Considering we’re supposed to be at the peak of the current 11-year solar cycle, scientists are watching the spots carefully to see what, if any, flares and ejections they will emit and how screwed all of us electricity-dependent people will be.
More Mindless Drivel from a Meaningless Mind
I have a bad habit of writing random notes to myself in the middle of Word documents containing stories/research papers/etc.
Like, I just tack the note onto the end of a paragraph, regardless of said paragraph’s contents.
Example: so this fanfic…it’s like 130 pages and it’s gotten really, really dark, right? Around page 80, there’s this huge scene where the characters are talking about self-harm. At the end of one particularly emotionally-charged paragraph I have in all caps: “JOHN UPDIKE LOOKS LIKE A BAMF.” (well, he does.)
And then a couple pages later: “BUY SHAMPOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!”
Oh dear.
More somber and much more important news. God, look at that thing:
That’s so depressing I don’t even have words.
Related: here’s an article from back in 2011 that actually has a compressed sample of the sound another massive iceberg made when it split (tell me this isn’t the most haunting sound ever).
ELEVATORS GONNA ELEVATE
Book survey!
Favorite childhood book: A Fly Went By by Dr. Seuss (really young child), and Skinnybones by Barbara Park (older child) (freaking hilarious book, read it).
What are you reading right now? Leibniz: An Intellectual Biography by Maria Antognazza.
What books do you have on request at the library? I owe them like $200 still from last semester, so….nothing.
Bad book habit? I think I hold the Moscow record for most number of overdue books. And the record for the longest amount of time the books were overdue.
What do you currently have checked out at the library? Uh…I have The Remains of the Day still checked out as well as Philosophers at War, but I think I’ve had both of those checked out for so long that the UI library has deemed them “lost” and I think I own them now.
Do you have an e-reader? Nopers.
Do you prefer to read one book at a time, or several at once? I really like to just focus on one book at a time. The way I read and the way I retain things, I tend to mash story lines/plots/characters together into one habitat in my brain. Not such a good thing when reading more than one book at a time.
Have your reading habits changed since starting a blog? Yes, I suppose, technically, since I started blogging just as college started and just as I had a lot less time to read for fun.
What is your reading comfort zone? I’ll take decent, well-written sci-fi (like Verne and Wells), but I will NOT touch romance or fantasy. Everything else is game.
Can you read on the bus? I couldn’t for the longest time, then I started taking hour-long bus commutes in Vancouver and the nausea disappeared. Reading commenced!
Favorite place to read? Probably on the bus, actually. Makes me feel like I’m doing something productive.
What is your policy on book lending? Nobody ever borrows books from me, so I don’t really know.
Do you ever write in the margins of your books? With non-fiction, yes.
Not even with text books? Oh gods yes.
What is your favorite language to read in? I can’t read in anything but English, ‘cause I’m stupid.
What makes you love a book? I’m much more of a character person than a plot person. If a book has no characters I can sympathize with/empathize with/love/hate, I won’t like it. I’ve also found myself automatically liking a book that can make my nether regions tingle with its use of prose. Lolita was a major, major example of this.
What will inspire you to recommend a book? See above.
Favorite genre? Classics?
Name a case in which hype ruined your reading experience: I remember before I’d read any Steinbeck I’d always heard people say “ZOMG STEINBECK MAKES SUCH SEXY WORDINGZ LOLZ” and then I tried to get through Grapes of Wrath and I wanted to shoot myself in the face. I cannot handle his style.
If you could read in a foreign language, which language would you choose? Freaking Latin or French, bro.
Most intimidating book you’ve ever read? I think War and Peace was intimidating just because of its sheer size. Plus I was like 13 when I read it. More recently was probably either Dr. Zhivago, just because Pasternak’s writing style is like “I’LL EAT YO FACE!”
Most intimidating book you’re too nervous to begin? Joyce’s Ulysses. I’ve…heard things about that book.
Favorite fictional character? Phileas Fogg. Captain Queeg. Jay Gatsby. Ivan from The Brothers Karamazov. Ozymandias from Watchmen.
Favorite fictional villain? Does Captain Queeg count as a villain?
Name a book that you could/would not finish: Anything Steinbeck. Blaughdfhsgh.
What distracts you easily when you’re reading? My own thoughts.
How often do you skim a book before reading it? I read the first few paragraphs. If they’re engaging, I check it out! I try not to read the blurb ‘cause I don’t want to know what it’s about past the first page.
What would cause you to stop reading a book half-way through? Either disliking it immensely or getting super busy.
Do you like to keep your books organized? They are ordered from smallest in height to tallest in height. ‘Cause that’s the aesthetic I like.
Name a book that made you angry: Atwood’s A Handmaid’s Tale. The ending made want to stab people because it was so perfect up until like the last five pages and then it just tanked for me.
A book you didn’t expect to like but did? Clark’s The Ox-Bow Incident. I started reading it (without knowing anything about it) and was like, “oh. A Western.” But then it got amazing. Brilliant book, yo.
A book that you expected to like but didn’t? The Sun Also Rises. I love Hemingway, but this book just wasn’t doing it for me.
Favorite guilt-free, pleasure reading? Smutty fan fiction, man. The further from canon, the better.
OH GODS
So early this morning I posted on my Tumblr a set of screenshots of Wolfram Alpha jokes.
And then this happened this afternoon:
Freaking Wolfram Alpha! Holy crap. Highlight of my day!
Yeah.
Most peoples’ Tumblrs: Dr. Who, Sherlock, Harry Potter.
My Tumblr: Math, Wolfram Alpha, Leibniz.
(I’m going to die alone, aren’t I?)
Stop whining or I will TURN THIS BLOG AROUND AND GO HOME
I WISH I WAS AT RTX LALALALALALA.
Anyway.
Can I take a moment and mention that this year has been particularly EXCELLENT for music? ‘Cause it has.
Songs needing appreciation:
This was the freebie last week on iTunes. I didn’t like it at first, but it totally grew on me.
How insanely chill is this song? Seriously.
Beautiful remix!
I heard this on a YouTube ad and had to check it out.
Also, my mom and I went to Spokane this afternoon to visit Auntie’s Bookstore. I got THIS!
The whole middle section is about calculus. SCORE!
MY FRIENDS KNOW ME SO WELL
Look at this ridiculously adorable thing.
This was the “surprise” Nick sent me awhile back: a standard normal distribution plushie!! I told him about this Etsy shop like three years ago and then this dude shows up in the mail.
He is my new favorite little buddy.
LOOK AT HIM SMILING LIKE “YEAH I KNOW I’VE GOT A MEAN OF ZERO AND A STANDARD DEVIATION OF ONE AND I KNOW YOU WANT MY BOD”
He is so freaking adorable I can’t even stand it.
Right now he’s chilling with all my stats books, but I might bring him to my office to chill there.
Thankyouthankyouthankyou, Nick!
Fifty Shades of Eigengrau
Why does my butt hurt? I walked the 20-mile round trip to Pullman, I didn’t butt-glide it.
Anyway.
So out of curiosity (and because I’ve got an INFLUX OF FREE TIME that I’m failing to use constructively), I went back and made a list of every Leibniz reference I’ve made on here since February 19, 2008 (the day we covered him in Modern Philosophy).
Because that’s the type of thing I do.
Results:
- 26 blogs dedicated solely to him.
- 20 pages’ worth of Leibniz references, not counting the material from the 26 Leibniz-only blogs.
Holy crap, I am obsessed.
Am I sorry?
NOPE.
I also REALLY miss calculus class. Time to MIT it up!
Are Trivial Jackets just Petticoats?
FREAKING TUMBLR, MAN
Watch this.
Just do it.
The guy who sings “I Can Go the Distance” is amazing and the guy who does the Gaston Song sounds JUST LIKE HIM.
Happy Birthday, Leibniz, You Magnificent Human Being
OH YOU KNEW IT WAS COMING.
LEIBNIZ DAY!
367 years ago today, the coolest polymath to ever exist was born.
I was hoping to be through Antognazza’s biography of him by today so I could extoll every inch of his beautiful mind that is covered in the 664-page bio, but alas, calc III happened (not that I’m complaining) and so my reading time was severely hindered. So I’m about halfway through as of writing this blog (I think he’s in his 40s at this point in the bio).
And with each page I’m like, “holy monads, Batman, it is not possible to like this man any more than I already do.”
And then I read the next page and I like him even more.
It’s hard for me to express exactly why I like Leibniz so much. As I mentioned in a past blog, as soon as I started reading his work and reading about him in general I felt this weird connection with him. Like we were supposed to know each other but the universe was like “NOPE!” and threw us into the mix a couple centuries apart.
(Don’t judge me, I’m really trying to not sound creepy. Am I failing miserably?)
And as I’ve mentioned in other blogs, it really seems like he was just a good guy. He wasn’t a buttface to those who disagreed with his philosophy or ideas about the natural world. He was accused like five separate times of stealing others’ ideas (which he never did) but never totally flipped out and started smothering people with his wig. According to the reports of his contemporaries, he was very kind, congenial, and graceful in social settings. The ladies seemed to dig him (SMART LADIES!). AND he was about as naturally intellectually curious as a person could be.
Seriously. A year after his father’s death when Leibniz was six, he inherited his library and immediately worked to teach himself Greek and Latin so that he could read the works of the ancient philosophers (his father taught moral philosophy at the University of Leipzig). He received his law degree when he was like 19 and for his doctoral dissertation he wrote some work on permutations/combinations that was fairly groundbreaking. And this was before he even started to seriously get into the field of mathematics.
Yup, the guy who invented calculus didn’t really start into math until his twenties. He was interested in law and philosophy originally, but as he continued to refine his ideas he began to move into math. As he began his travels around Europe after finishing his education, it became clear to him that his mathematical knowledge was lacking. So he was like, “oh crap, better catch up!” and pretty much taught himself everything without anyone’s help
Actually, when I was reading about his early life in the bio, it was this fact that he was so self-taught that was really the cause behind most of the accusations of plagiarism he faced. He didn’t start out in math, as I said, so he had to catch himself up. Along the way, he started making advancements and discoveries that, to him, were new and unique, and thus he eagerly published them. But unbeknownst to him, several of these major discoveries were things that had actually been discovered and published not too long before. So some people (*cough*Hooke*cough*) were like “hey, you totally got that from [insert mathematician here]! THIEF!” even though he had come up with it on his own.
Really. That happened to him like three times even before the whole calculus thing.
And did you know he was the one who came up with what is today known as Cramer’s Rule? Truth! But like a lot of the stuff he developed, it was so advanced for his time that it just kind of sat in his notes and wasn’t used for a long time.
(Like his binary!)
But I think the one thing that I really, really like about him is the fact that he was always looking for connections between everything. He was convinced that even the most isolated bits of the universe and of human knowledge were connected to everything else and that a system could be developed with which we could express these connections and better understand them. In everything he did, he always seemed to be driving towards defining this system and better describing the connectivity of the universe.
And that’s just cool.
NNNNNNNNNNNNF I JUST LOVE HIM, OKAY?
(I live in a fantasy world where Leibniz and I are married and he does calculus and I do statistics and we do each other and life is perfect.)
Um…anyway.
Expect another Leibniz-heavy blog when I finish the whole bio, ‘cause it’s going to happen whether you like it or not.
Until next year!
Happy birthday, Gottfried! <3








