Tag Archives: materialism

The Materialism Post: February 2020 Edition

Because, as always, it’s nice to have a list of the things I want to buy in case I ever decide to, you know, buy them.

Some of these are practical, some of them are not. I leave it to you, good reader, to figure out which are which!

A Klein bottle! I already have Klein bottle earrings from this site thanks to my mom, but a little bottle to put in my office would be cool, too!

All of these nail polishes. I love them. That deep blue is gorgeous.

Neon eyeshadow? Yes, please!

I used to have a whole bunch of Legos when I was a kid. Just a bunch of the bricks; I don’t know if any of the kits were out at that time. I miss all those Legos. I want twenty of these bins.

Ohmygodohmygodohmygod is this a whole book on the SI units?!?!??!??!?1?

*deranged screeching*

 

There weren’t as many thingies as I thought there were. That’s unusual.

Materialism: November 2019 Edition

HEYOOOOOO so it’s time for my monthly-ish “I want material things” blog, ‘cause why the hell not. It’s a good way to keep a list of things I like in case I ever do go on a little shopping spree.

Let’s go!

Is that all? Haha, I was thinking there was more.

I AM A MATERIAL GIRL

Hi.

Here’s more random nonsense I want to buy, because for some reason the you’re-like-a-shopaholic-but-not-really-because-you-rarely-actually-buy-any-of-this-stuff part of my brain is all hyped up this year.

Christmas List Party Fun Time 2K16

Note: no one has to get me any of this stuff. This is just stuff I’ve found that I think is cool.

Go!

Leibniz print! Too bad they don’t have wall-sized ones.

The hologram backpack is back in stock!

Butterfly scarf!

I STILL LOVE THESE HEADPHONES

 

Stuff

Every so often I get an overwhelming urge to buy stuff.

Just…buy stuff. Lots of it all at once.

Does this happen to others, or is it a product of 26 years of watching my dad speed-dial QVC every other day?* Either way, I feel bad when such urges surface. I don’t always act on them, and when I do I only buy two or three things at most, but still.

I actually think I just like getting stuff in the mail. Maybe I need a penpal or something.

 

*Not an exaggeration.

Paaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanpsychism!

Guess what, kids? PHILOSOPHY TIME!

Panpsychism is the view that all matter possesses a soul (or has consciousness). There are a couple of different types of this view, though, and there are also different types of similar views that aren’t technically panpsychism.

Hylozoism, which is similar but not exactly the same, holds that all forms of matter posess life. It’s different from panpsychism because life and souls are obviously two different things, and it is different than animism because animism focuses more on things having consciousnesses. In other words, hylozoism is the doctrine that everything is alive, while panpsychism is the belief that everything is conscious.

So. You all may or may not believe this, but I’ve always been of this sort of belief, that all matter is, in some way, alive. I think that this belief is based on the fact that as a materialist, I don’t think consciousness in humans arises from anything but the physical components of the brain. That is, consciousness is due to the chemical and electrical interactions of the components that makeup the brain, rather than any sort of “extra” component, like a soul or some other special addition to the physical.
Because I’m a materialist, I think that human consciousness arises, then, solely out of the physical. Because of this, I don’t believe that certain physical “components” are capable of coming together and achieving human consciousness—or any other consciousness/life/etc.—if others aren’t.

That’s a bit difficult to understand; let me put it another way. There’s a metric ton (not literally, shut up) of atoms that make up the human body, right? And a lot of those atoms go into making up the brain—in which, according to materialists, the consciousness originates and exists.

Now we can take this in two directions (still assuming materialism):

1. Either consciousness arises out of only a set of specific arrangements of atoms, or

2. All atoms/smallest particles in the universe (obviously not atoms, but ‘atom’ is familiar and easiest to conceptualize) are capable of maintaining a sort of consciousness on their own.

It seems odd to me that only certain atoms in certain arrangements are capable of bringing about any sort of consciousness without the additional condition that consciousness is a potential property of all atoms. Why would only specific combinations lead to consciousness, and what would make certain that the “right” atoms would be chosen in the first place? I think that a variation of consciousness—certainly not human consciousness or any type we can recognize—exists in every atom in the universe. I think culminations of these atomic consciousnesses can lead to other variations, uncluding human consciousness, but I think that there must exist some sort of basal form of it in everything.

Does that make sense?

Anyway, it’s how I’ve always seen it.